Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM): A Proactive Cybersecurity Framework
What Is Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)?
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) is a term first introduced by Gartner® in 2022. CTEM is not a product, but a set of cybersecurity processes and capabilities, laid out across 5 phases, that equip enterprises to continually and consistently evaluate the accessibility, exposure, and exploitability of an enterprise’s digital and physical assets.
How the CTEM Framework Works:
The 5 Stages of a CTEM Program
CTEM is a systematic approach to continuously refine exposure management priorities, operating through a cycle of five key stages. This recurring CTEM lifecycle enables security teams to stay in tune with the evolving threat landscape and eliminate exposures before they become a security incident.
The first phase is that of defining which assets and attack surfaces are in scope for the CTEM program. User endpoints, cloud workloads, data center, to name a few. Security teams should be guided by the priorities of their business stakeholders.
Zafran automatically aggregates, normalizes and de-duplicates vulnerability and asset data from the scanners and security tools you already run—cloud, on-prem and application—so CTEM teams start the scoping phase with one authoritative inventory rather than piecemeal lists.
When first beginning your CTEM program, start small. Do not attempt to boil the ocean. Applied learning along the way will refine your program and prepare you to expand scope.
Use security tools to discover assets, vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations relevant to the CTEM’s program’s defined scope.
Go beyond periodic vulnerability scans and proactively hunt for exposures.
When in doubt, remember: the objective of exposure management is to identify and address the threats most likely to be exploited. Account for threat intel, compensating security controls (aka, defenses), available mitigations, and business criticality to move beyond generic severity measures.
CVSS Medium severity vulns are exploited more often than Criticals and Highs combined. Generic risk measures are a starting point. Gather info on your specific risk context, to understand what are actually your biggest threats and fight alert fatigue.
Within the context of CTEM, validation not only includes assessing how the attacker can exploit the exposure, but also verifying the speed, adequacy, and feasibility of the suggested treatment.
Map exposures to your compensating controls to determine whether they effectively mitigate specific attacker TTPs. Automating this process is key to success at scale.
To mobilize a group of resources is to organize and coordinate them for maximum effect, which, in this case, is winning the cybersecurity battle. Consider available options. Communicate with and align security and IT teams, rallying them around an achievable risk reduction objective. In this phase, risk reduction may take the traditional form of remediation of root cause (e.g., patching a host OS, updating a cloud workload image), as well as the newer risk mitigation techniques using your existing security tools.
Garbage in, garbage out. Use Prioritization and Validation outputs to reduce noise at the input of Mobilization. This will focus limited resources and build cross-functional trust among those who find the exposures and those who fix them.
The Business Value of CTEM:
“Why Do I Care?”
Vulnerability exploitations are now the leading initial access vector behind security breaches. Additionally, research proves that CVSS Mediums are exploited more frequently than CVSS Criticals and Highs combined. Sophisticated threat actors are shifting tactics, even as traditional vulnerability management processes leave organizations chasing SLA compliance instead of tackling risk. Our processes and KPIs are not driving the intended behavior, even if we know, intuitively, what better should look like. This is why CTEM matters.
A CTEM program reveals the vulnerabilities most likely to be exploited in your environment. It analyzes factors unique to your organization’s hybrid cloud context, to move beyond generic risk measures and definitively direct limited resources to your biggest threats. One size does not fit all.
A CTEM program mobilizes resources efficiently to create better cybersecurity outcomes. Better coordination, shorter exposure windows, and faster MTTR (Mean Time to Remediate).
CTEM vs. Traditional Vulnerability Management: What's the Difference?
Traditional vulnerability management (VM) revolves around periodic vulnerability scans, driving the organization to chase SLA compliance tied to generic severity measures (i.e., CVSS). In contrast, CTEM provides a real-time, continuous process to detect, hunt, and proactively eliminate high-risk exposures that attackers are most likely to exploit. It contemplates the factors unique to the organization’s IT environment that necessarily affect risk. In this way, the CTEM-driven VM practice surfaces the most pressing vulnerabilities facing the organization, and more effectively mobilizes resources (people, process, technology) to neutralize the threat.
Benefits of CTEM
for Enterprise Cybersecurity
CTEM delivers measurable value by focusing on exposures that matter most.
Key Benefits Include:
Reduced Risk of Breach: Eliminate initial attack vectors (IAVs) before they can be exploited
Smarter Resource Allocation: Focus security efforts where they’ll have the greatest impact.
Faster Detection and Response: Improve visibility and reaction time to real-world threats.
Alignment with Business Priorities: Ensure cybersecurity decisions support operational goals.
Why Choose Zafran To Support Your CTEM Program?
The Zafran Threat Exposure Management Platform supports the entire CTEM lifecycle, from scoping to mobilization, through a combination of contextualized risk analysis, real-time validation of mitigation techniques, and optimized remediation workflows, all integrated with the customer’s existing security ecosystem
Get CTEM Demo